Woody Breast (WB) myopathy has emerged as one of the most costly quality defects in modern broiler production, with flock-level surveys showing overall incidences > 70% and ~ 12% of carcasses graded as "severe" [Petracci et al., 2015; Bordini et al., 2023; Che et al., 2022]. The resulting abnormal hardening of the Pectoralis major markedly lowers consumer acceptance and is estimated to cost the North-American poultry sector hundreds of millions of dollars annually (Kuttappan et al., 2016).
On today's processing lines, WB assessment still depends on manual palpation and visual inspection, which is labor-intensive, subjective, and exposes product surfaces to cross-contamination (Livingston et al., 2019; Pang et al., 2020; Ross et al., 2020). Reported mis-classification rates can reach 25%[1], and operator accuracy may fall to ≈ 60%[2] after prolonged shifts because of fatigue. These shortcomings create an urgent demand for an objective, rapid, and non-contact on-line solution.
Figure 1: (Left) Sampling and Woody Breast (WB) Assessment at a Poultry Processing Facility, and (Right) top view of normal and WB-affected samples.
In our earlier work we first proposed broadband light-scattering imaging (B-LSI), in which a collimated broadband beam illuminates the fillet and a monochrome camera records saturation/attenuation profiles; shape descriptors from these profiles achieved 92.3% accuracy in differentiating normal and WB fillets (Cai & Lu 2025a). We then built a hyperspectral LSI (H-LSI) prototype covering 400–1000 nm (Mu & Lu 2025). Both LSI variants rely on push-broom line scanning, requiring ~ 5 s (B-LSI) and ~ 12 s (H-LSI) per fillet—far slower than the sub-second cycle times demanded by commercial conveyors. To capture the ridge-like bulging characteristic of WB, we next developed structured illumination reflectance imaging (SIRI) with phase-measuring profilometry; dense surface geometry alone separated WB from normal fillets with ≈ 93% accuracy, an 8–11% gain over 2-D intensity features (Cai & Lu 2025b). SIRI, however, requires three phase-shift exposures per view, limiting belt speed and motivating our pursuit of high-throughput laser triangulation.
Active laser-triangulation ranging delivers sub-millimetre depth at video rates and remains robust on glossy, texture-less chicken surfaces. This project will therefore develop a line-laser triangulation 3-D vision system, integrating support-vector machines and a PointNet++ network, to enable real-time WB detection and grading on moving conveyor belts—bridging the gap between laboratory prototypes and the industrial need for high-throughput, reliable inspection.
Figure 2: The schematic of a 3D laser profiling system designed for online woody breast inspection of chicken breast fillets.
Figures 2 and 3 depict the overall workflow of system calibration and 3D reconstruction. Briefly, the calibration phase established the system's geometric reference frame, performed camera calibration, estimated the pose of each calibration board, and determined the laser plane. Meanwhile, the displacement of the calibration board was tracked, and the exact amount of movement of the conveyor belt between adjacent frames was recorded. With the knowledge of the laser plane, the detected pixels were to be converted instantly and rigidly into a dense, single-frame point cloud and merged with previous clouds to form a global model in the 3D reconstruction phase. After further point cloud processing (e.g., denoising and fillet segmentation), the consolidated point cloud would be utilized for downstream modeling and sample classification.
Figure 3: System calibration and online 3D reconstruction workflow of the laser profiling system.
We employ two complementary pipelines for classifying WB point clouds:
1. Manual features + SVM — First, the 3D point cloud is projected into a 192×192 height map, then
texture features (LBP, BSIF, and HOG) are extracted, standardized,
and input into RBF-SVM, with parameters optimized through cross-validation.
2. Enhanced PointNet++ — Center-normalize the original point cloud, add normal vectors and curvature,
and use four-level MSG set-based sampling to learn
local-global geometric features, then directly output the binary classification probability.
Both models were tested on three speed conditions (5, 10, and 15 cm/s) with training, validation,
and test sets randomly split into 70/15/15% and repeated 50 times.
Conveyor speed | Mean Absolute Error (MAE, mm) | Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE, %) | Density (PTS/cm2) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x-axis | y-axis | z-axis | x-axis | y-axis | z-axis | ||
5 cm/s | 1.58 | 0.52 | 0.29 | 1.50 | 0.68 | 0.87 | 82.7 |
10 cm/s | 1.75 | 3.44 | 0.73 | 1.66 | 4.52 | 2.21 | 46.6 |
15 cm/s | 2.13 | 5.30 | 2.56 | 2.03 | 6.96 | 7.70 | 31.0 |
Average | 1.82 | 3.09 | 1.19 | 1.73 | 4.05 | 3.59 | 53.4 |
Figure 4: Side-view (Y-Z) of 3D reconstruction of a trapezoidal calibration block (TCB) (top), normal fillet (middle), and WB-affected fillet (bottom) at three conveyor speeds, where the color indicates height on the z-axis.
Figure 5: Top-view (X-Y) of 3D reconstruction of a trapezoidal calibration block (TCB) (top), normal fillet (middle), and WB-affected fillet (bottom) at three conveyor speeds, where the color indicates height on the z-axis.
Conveyor speed | Feature-based SVM | PointNet++ | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ACC (%) | Recall (%) | ACC (%) | Recall (%) | |
5 cm/s | 88.42 ±2.03 | 87.66 ±2.73 | 88.91 ±1.83 | 89.5 ±2.11 |
10 cm/s | 86.19 ±4.12 | 85.12 ±3.58 | 84.28 ±3.87 | 83.0 ±3.74 |
15 cm/s | 82.53 ±4.68 | 81.01 ±4.89 | 80.91 ±4.13 | 79.0 ±4.40 |
@unpublished{zhang2025laser, title = {A New Laser Profiling System for Online, Real-Time Detection of Broiler Breast Fillets with Woody Breast}, author = {Zhang, Jiaming and Lu, Yuzhen}, journal = {Journal of Food Engineering}, year = {2025}, note = {Under review} }
This work is supported by the Michigan Alliance for Animal Agriculture (M-AAA), project ID number AA-23-0029, from AgBioResearch and MSU Extension at Michigan State University, in partnership with the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development. The authors thank Miller Poultry (Orland, IN) for providing chicken fillets and assisting in manual assessment of WB conditions in this study.